Shattering Time Management Myth #12: Multitasking Isn’t a Talent, It’s a Handicap—How to Beat the Disease Once and for All…

chainsaw_juggling5Hey, can you remember a time when you heard somebody say, “I’m multitasking!” and they sounded excited about it, like they’d just mastered the unicycle? 

If you can’t think of anybody right off, it may have been you.

 

Somewhere along the way, multitasking got a good name.  It’s a Cube Farm Myth of epic proportion, and proof that any falsehood repeatedly heard over time will be regarded as truthful. 

 

The real deal on this one:  Contrary to common logic, multitasking isn’t a talent and it’s nothing to be proud of.

 

We’ve all tried it. 

 

It doesn’t work.

 

Heck, it’s not even fun.

 

The cruel part is, experience might seem to support the myth that multitasking equates to productivity:  Because we’re engaged in several things at once, we have the temporary sensation that we’re also accomplishing several things at once.

 

But this feeling goes away right after the multitasking stops. 

As we sober up from the super-hero adrenaline buzz of doing everything at once, a couple of familiar feelings can creep in on us: 

1-Today was hectic” (because we were trying to do too much), and

 

2-I feel like I didn’t get anything done” (because we were trying to do too much).

 

If you’ve ever had these thoughts after putting in a hard day, multitasking may have been the agent saboteur.  And it all happened because of the approach (or lack of an approach) that you had going in.

 

Consider this, if you were a painter with five houses to paint, which of these strategies would seem most effective time-wise:

 

1-Paint the entire first house, then the next, then the next, until finished, or

 

2-Paint one room in the first house, then paint one room in the next, and so on, until finished?

 

If you picked number one, you’re either cured already, or you will be after you read this. 

 

If you picked number two, you’re addicted to multitasking—stop reading and find somebody with a herringbone jacket, a pipe, and a black leather couch.

 

Okay, you’re still here, so I’ll tell you what the ones who just left can’t comprehend:  Multitasking is ineffective because there’s a natural loss of momentum and focus when we shift from one task… to another. 

 

Unlike the hapless painter who’d paint part of one house and then another, most of us don’t have a “strategy” that allows for multitasking.  Instead, we fall prey to it because we allow ourselves to be victims of interruption.  Cell phones, desk phones, email, faxes, Blackberries, television, radio, desk papers, and of course the most vicious of them all—the walk-in intruder—distract us from what we’re doing.

 

So here’s the secret… if multitasking is a sickness, distraction is the virus that causes it.

 

________________________________________________________________________

 

One study at UC Irvine found that on average, it takes roughly 20 minutes to get regrouped and back to the same point we were at before the interruption.  Any time we allow a distraction to lure us away, we’re now attempting to do more than one thing at a time, aren’t we?  And we’ll fall victim to this 20 minute recovery period.  Lack of focus, loss of productivity, and stress immediately follow.  

 

Even wilder:  Another study cited in Discover Magazine reached the conclusion that people who were constantly interrupted by emails and instant messages performed worse in a controlled test than people who had been smoking marijuana.  The “Continuous Partial Attention” (fancy name for multitasking) actually had the effect of temporarily lowering the IQs of those who were continually distracted.

________________________________________________________________________

 

 

In my opinion, all this is strictly a modern phenomenon.  Did anyone talk about multi-tasking 150 years ago?  Did the idea even exist?  Do you think a blacksmith ever felt the urge to multitask?  Technology is the cause of all this.  In theory it’s supposed to make life simpler, but really all the gadgets and “helpful” machinery just end up giving us more stuff to deal with.  And we take the bait…  

 

We check our email when the bell rings.

 

We answer the phone every time it rings. 

 

We toggle between internet windows.

 

And of course, we drop everything and talk to anyone who stops by.

 

Any time we follow distractions, we’re handing ourselves over to the whims of the world around us.  We naively allow outside forces to dictate our activities, and we call our response “multitasking”.  

 

So multitasking isn’t so much a decision… as a result.  And if you don’t have a plan to defend yourself, by default multi-tasking will overtake you. 

 

The good news?  Decision is the antidote.  To eliminate the temptation of multi-tasking, make a deliberate decision to focus… and eliminate interruptions: 

 

1-Consciously commit to working on just one thing—and take it to completion, and

 

2-Eliminate ANYTHING that will distract you from your task:  Ignore any uncontrollable interruptions like phones, email, and intruders (and be prepared to deal with these time-vampires forcefully—or they’ll remorselessly suck the blood out of your work day).

 

Oh, and one last caution I have to include:  There’s another source of distraction that will lure you into the pit of multitasking:  Your thoughts.  Even when you’ve eliminated all outside interferences, you’ll still have to deal with yourself. 

 

Would you agree that ultimately, your own thoughts are your worst enemy?

 

Negativity, worry, and of course the old foe self-distraction, are always there to contend with.  You may be distracted with thoughts of issues apart from your work.  Or you may suddenly remember something you forgot to do—and drop everything to handle it.  Suddenly you’re multitasking again.

 

Thought can be harnessed, or allowed to run wild.  In either case, it’s always the starting point for every action you take, so be wary of what you think about.

 

The ultimate key to success—and the biggest challenge—is controlling yourself. 

 

Control your thoughts… and you control your life. 

 

Are you up for it?

_________________________________________________________

 

Speaking of thoughts, leave a comment with yours—I’m interested in your take…

 

 

-jef

 

 

 

 

Refer this blog post to a friend or colleague…

Tags: , ,

Comments

  1. July 13th, 2009 | 2:55 pm

    I’ve been waiting for this post! =) Not a big surprise but I do better when I can concentrate on one thing at a time. I think that whoever came up with this concept of multi-tasking just needed an excuse to not get anything done to completion. They finished 1/2 of all their projects but not a single one complete! Now if only I could tell the hiring managers on the interviews I go on that “No, I’m not a good multi-tasker…and I don’t want to be” and get away with it!

  2. Jef
    July 13th, 2009 | 3:21 pm

    Yeah, we don’t know who came up with this, do we? Nobody running to the mike claiming they’re the ‘creator of multitasking’.

    Do managers want to hire ‘good multitaskers’? Are they still asking this?

    You hit on a great point, Amy, hadn’t really thought of it quite like this, thanks: An employee says to a shallow-thinking boss, “I’m halfway complete on the Ferguson, Masterson, and Jorgensen projects” will probably be viewed as more productive than the the employee who says, “I’m finished with the Ferguson project, starting tomorrow on the next one.”

    Lots of backward thinking out there, thought to be forward… because the majority think it. (Did that make sense?)

    Thanks Amy!

  3. July 13th, 2009 | 11:08 pm

    Hi Jef, here’s my favorite: ‘…There’s another source of distraction that will lure you into the pit of multitasking: Your thoughts.’ Yes, this is the killer.

    Also: wanting to escape the task at hand!

    Discipline and commitment are so important aren’t they?

    We all have many things to do, and multi-tasking is impossible. I think people use that term just because it sounds ‘cool.’ It’s more like scatter-brain. One thing at a time and yes, bring it to completion. If an employee needs to do several things in a day, it should be broken down into tasks, and each task done separately from the other. One task at a time. For example:

    1) attend to emails
    2) return phone calls
    3) work on project A
    4) file
    5) attend meeting
    6) work on project B etc.

    Now what do you think about the ‘multi-tasking’ driver? Driving, while taking a video, or eating a hamburger.

    OH by the way i did not understand the ‘backward thinking out there…’

  4. Jef
    July 13th, 2009 | 11:19 pm

    Yep, Jeannie, ‘escape the task at hand’… we do tend to drop what we’re doing for something easier, or more exciting. Great point.

    Multitasking does sound cool, probably because: 1-Myth has it that it’s worthy of noting on a resume, and 2-It’s a low form of juggling. And jugglers always drop jaws… who doesn’t think those guys are amazing?

    Great insights, Jeannie, thanks!

    (PS–Did ANYBODY get my comment about ‘backward thinking’? I’m standing by it regardless…)

    -jef

  5. July 13th, 2009 | 11:24 pm

    Amy, I like what you said:
    if only I could tell the hiring managers on the interviews I go on that “No, I’m not a good multi-tasker…and I don’t want to be” and get away with it!

    You can say, have you read Jef Nance’s blog? There’s no such thing as multi-tasking! That’s so 90’s. LOL

  6. July 14th, 2009 | 1:27 pm

    I get the backward thinking comment! LOL!

  7. Jef
    July 14th, 2009 | 1:38 pm

    Good deal, glad to hear it… thanks for your vote Amy!

    -j

Leave a reply